[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Issue 2751, Subversion 1.4.4, Subversion 1.3.3

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-03-27 14:08:10 CEST

On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:07:34AM -0400, John Szakmeister wrote:
> >>plenty of times. But having another fs-knowledgable developer say, "Yep,
> >>looks great" would be very comforting.
> >
> >The BDB part looks reasonable to me, it does what you and kfogel have
> >decided to do.
> I took a look as well, and I concur.

My DAG-fu is weak, but it looks good to me too.

For FSFS, this seems to have the effect that the property change in the
first revision is silently reverted from the second revision without a
corresponding change to the node being recorded.

I've not checked, but this could result is weirdness such as: querying
the dirprops on r1 returns {X}, querying them on r2 returns {Y}, running
'svn up' from r1 to r2 results in no changes to dirprops.


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Mar 27 14:08:26 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.