Re: Update correctness vs speed (was: [Issue 2746] New - update overwrites w/o warning local modification if local timestamp did not change)

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2007-03-25 20:25:37 CEST

On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 15:12 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> When does CVS preserve the original file? It never did, AFAIK. -- justin

I believe it may do so before performing an update-merge.

It certainly does not do so when it thinks the working file is
unmodified; that would have an enormous space cost.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Mar 25 20:26:37 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Glasser: "Re: svn commit: r24015 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs"
Previous message: Erik Huelsmann: "Closing issue 2238: propset/del on URLs?"
In reply to: Justin Erenkrantz: "Re: *Update* correctness vs speed (was: [Issue 2746] New - update overwrites w/o warning local modification if local timestamp did not change)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

Re: *Update* correctness vs speed (was: [Issue 2746] New - update overwrites w/o warning local modification if local timestamp did not change)

Re: Update correctness vs speed (was: [Issue 2746] New - update overwrites w/o warning local modification if local timestamp did not change)