Re: [Issue 2746] New - update overwrites w/o warning local modification if local timestamp did not change
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+svn_at_vinc17.org>
 
Date: 2007-03-24 01:20:09 CET 
On 2007-03-21 18:48:50 +0100, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
 OK, I can see that on one of my accounts, e.g.
 Access: 2006-11-29 17:33:34.000000000 +0100
 It doesn't seem to occur much often though. Instead of using mtime +
 For instance, if the user whishes, it is possible to update the status
 Now the problem with ctime is not critical, i.e. the user won't lose
 [*] or max(mtime,ctime).
 > [*] As indicated in
 It also says that the mtime can be back-dated, thus cannot be trusted,
 -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent_at_vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sat Mar 24 01:20:25 2007  | 
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.