[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Storing IDE-specific files in the SVN repository

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2007-03-23 01:14:02 CET

On 3/23/07, Karl Fogel <kfogel@red-bean.com> wrote:
> "Mark Phippard" <markphip@gmail.com> writes:
> > Yes, all of the files begin with dot.
> >
> > What would you recommend? Should I commit to trunk to force people to
> > come out against it if they are? Or commit to developer-resources so
> > that it is clearer what we want to put in trunk?
> I'd recommend posting a very short mail here, listing just the file
> names, in the body of the message not in a patch :-). Here, let's
> save some time...
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.cdtproject
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.project
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.classpath
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.settings/org.eclipse.jdt.ui.prefs
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/.settings/org.eclipse.cdt.core.prefs
> That's it, right?
> I have no objection to those going on trunk, because they'll be
> invisible, and they're not that big (43k total). I'd say if no one
> objects within a day, go for it. We can always revert, anyway.
> If I'd seen that file list right in front of my eyes the first time, I
> would have quickly +1'd and gone my merry way :-).

Great, I'll let it sit for the weekend and see if anyone objects. I thought
people might like to see the contents of the files too to get an idea on the

Mark Phippard
Received on Fri Mar 23 01:14:15 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.