Re: summer of code 2007

David Anderson wrote:
> Don't mind me, I'm on crack and completely and utterly misread the
> entire reply. +1 on what Malcolm says, with the exception that I'd
> like `svn patch` as a subcommand, not as Yet Another Tool.

+1 on 'svn diff' using "patch-ignored" stuff to carry the extra data.
+1 on 'svn patch' as a proper subcommand which can parse that output.

And on the question of whether 'svn diff' produces "clean" GNU patch output
by default, or whether it generates 'svn patch'-ready output by default, I
mildly favor the 'svn patch'-ready output. We can always use runtime config
to let folks choose the default *they'd* like.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand