Re: Sharded FSFS repositories - summary

Peter Lundblad wrote:
> Just to make sure, when talking about NTFS, are you talking about the
> performance of viewing the files in explorer or did you do tests on a lower
> level?

Both, though obviously performance with Explorer is much worse. My primary
experience with NTFS and lots of small files is a shopping cart application.
What I haven't tested is sequential vs random access of predetermined filenames.
   That's why I'd really rather write a utility that timed various scenarios on
different filesystems so we can get a good handle on how Subversion itself is
likely to behave.

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Blvd
Suite H
Lanham, MD 20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5747
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org