Re: [PROPOSAL] Move sleeping for timestamps to libsvn_wc

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato@collab.net> writes:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> I like this idea. Actually I've never understood why
>> sleep_for_timestamps stuff is in libsvn_client.
>
> I could be wrong, but I think it lives in _client at the moment because we
> wanted to sleep the minimum amount for a given high-level operation. The
> worry was with a single person running 'svn' in a scripted situation, not
> running any-ol-WC-library-consumer. And rather than sleep once per changed
> file, for example, we much preferred to sleep once per update, for example.

Exactly right.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 13 01:22:01 2007