Re: [PATCH] (2nd approach) Fix issue #1976: Set arbitrary revision properties (revprops) during commit.

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-03-02 08:43:40 CET

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:10:32AM +0100, Peter Lundblad wrote:
> I stand with my opinion that arbitrary metadata that's available when
> the commit starts (bug id, reviewer, possibly others) is the main use case we
> should care about.
>

I agree. I was thinking that the arbitrary-propset interface was more
convenient for the user and 'cleaner', but I really can't think of any
case where it'd be required.

Let's go with the upfront props thing.

Regards,
Malcolm

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Mar 2 08:44:04 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Kamesh Jayachandran: "Re: [PATCH]log and blame command should log the revision range in operational log"
Previous message: Peter Lundblad: "Re: [PATCH] (2nd approach) Fix issue #1976: Set arbitrary revision properties (revprops) during commit."
In reply to: Peter Lundblad: "Re: [PATCH] (2nd approach) Fix issue #1976: Set arbitrary revision properties (revprops) during commit."
Next in thread: Gerco Ballintijn: "[PATCH] (3rd try) Fix issue #1976: Set arbitrary revision properties (revprops) during commit."
Reply: Gerco Ballintijn: "[PATCH] (3rd try) Fix issue #1976: Set arbitrary revision properties (revprops) during commit."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]