C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> William Nagel wrote:
>> On Feb 4, 2007, at 2:16 AM, Karl Fogel wrote:
>>> A comment on the code: you've made the 'indentation' parameter
>>> to print_tree() have a new meaning. The doc string for that function
>>> should change to reflect this.
>>> Also, please provide a log message with your patch :-).
>> I fixed the doc string for print_tree, as per your suggestion, and
>> created a log message.
>> A new patch for issue 2663, as well as the log message are attached.
> There are a couple of minor problems here. First, you managed to introduce
> a single tab character into the source code (and we don't use tab
> characters). Secondly, I think we usually use the positive form of the
> recursion options. So, the parameter would be named 'recurse', and your
> logic reversed.
> I'll make these changes myself -- no need to go through another round of this.
Patch committed with the mods I mentioned, plus some others I found while
reviewing. (A missing "break;" statement after the new switch case; a
slightly off test description, etc.)
C. Michael Pilato <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Wed Feb 28 23:25:30 2007