Re: [PATCH] Allow clients to check out special files with unknown type

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-02-23 02:01:17 CET

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Malcolm Rowe wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:14:41PM -0800, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > I actually already wrote that patch. However, I subsequently
> > discarded it, as at the time people were in favor of comparing the
> > apr_status_t against EPERM directly.
>
> Is EPERM guaranteed to be defined? The current code in
> libsvn_subr/io.c handles the case where it's not.

Yeah, it basically always has, too.

POSIX.1 requires that EPERM be defined (unlink() failures return it).
I don't know whether or not this is sufficient for our use.

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Feb 23 02:01:31 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Rall: "Single character shortcut for 'log --limit'"
Previous message: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] Allow clients to check out special files with unknown type"
In reply to: Malcolm Rowe: "Re: [PATCH] Allow clients to check out special files with unknown type"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]