Re: [merge-tracking] 'svn blame' auditing
From: Stefan Haller <haller_at_ableton.com>
Date: 2007-02-21 21:30:56 CET
Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> Behavioral changes to 'blame' should be designed concurrently with
I agree. However, I think the auditing section of the requirements
Let's assume a specific scenario:
Alice commits r12 to branch-A.
Now, what do we expect to see from:
- svn log -r12 branch-B
Probably nothing, because branch-B didn't change in r12. (Although we
- svn log -r56 branch-B
Either the Joe commit, together with its log message, or/and (maybe
- svn blame branchB/somefile
We probably want to see the original authors (with their original
-- Stefan Haller Ableton http://www.ableton.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Feb 21 21:31:22 2007 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.