On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Peter Lundblad wrote:
> Karl Fogel writes:
> > However, I think it might be best to merge it to trunk as soon as it's
> > *no worse than* the feature it replaces, the "-N" option. -N has been
> I think it makes sense. The main point of doing features like this on a
> branch, as I see it is to avoid large stability problems on trunk. When that's
> not a problem, I think it is good to develop on trunk. So, +1 for
After briefly scoping the changes out, it looks like the current state
of affairs on the sparse-directories is merge-able with the
merge-tracking branch in about half a day's work. I'd rather see this
happen now, rather than it diverge any futher on a separate branch.
+1 to merge sparse-directories to trunk ASAP.
Received on Mon Jan 22 22:25:30 2007
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored