[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: atomic locking

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-01-19 17:35:08 CET

Just for the record, I've filed this as an enhancement request, issue
#2699 (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2699)

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On 1/18/07, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote
>
>> I don't recall whether it was intentionally implemented this way or not,
>> to be honest. I can certainly see the utility of an all-or-nothing set
>> of locks, and imagine it wouldn't be too terribly hard to implement as
>> much.
>
> Yeah, this use-case just didn't cross our minds when we designed the
> feature. It's certainly a feature that could be added in the future,
> if there were enough demand.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Fri Jan 19 17:35:30 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.