[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Make configure report the components detected

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-01-18 23:46:37 CET

Hopeully Erik can just commit this patch, saving us the overhead of an
issue.

On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:

> Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> > On 11/16/06, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
> >> What happened to this patch?
> >
> > Nothing: it's still sitting in my working copy. But, I think I should
> > apply it, given Peter's reaction.
>
> I don't think this ever got applied; shall I put it in the issue tracker?
>
> -Hyrum
>
> >> With regards
> >> Kamesh Jayachandran
> >> Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> >> > Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> >> >> On 10/9/06, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
> >> >>> I like this change.
> >> >>> One small suggestion, Can you attach the patch instead of inline
> >> text?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> >> >>> > Our current configure script warns at the end if BDB hasn't been
> >> >>> > found. Given that it's now just one of the components that can be
> >> >>> used
> >> >>> > Index: configure.in
> >> >>> > ===================================================================
> >> >>> > --- configure.in (revision 21833)
> >> >>> > +++ configure.in (working copy)
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > -You don't seem to have Berkeley DB version $db_version or newer
> >> >>> > -installed and linked to APR-UTIL. We have created Makefiles which
> >> >>> > -will build without the Berkeley DB back-end; your repositories
> >> will
> >> >>> > -use FSFS as the default back-end. You can find the latest
> >> >>> version of
> >> >>> > -Berkeley DB here:
> >> >>> > - http://www.sleepycat.com/download/index.shtml
> >> >>> > -])
> >> >>> > -;;
> >> >>> > + AC_MSG_NOTICE([ BerkeleyDB no])
> >> >>> > + ;;
> >> >>> > + "yes" )
> >> >>> > + AC_MSG_NOTICE([ BerkeleyDB $db_version])
> >> >>> > + ;;
> >> >>> > esac
> >> >>> > -
> >> >>> > +case "!$APXS!" in
> >> >>>
> >> >>> > + "!no!"|"!!" )
> >> >>> Why we have cruft of "!" here?
> >> >>
> >> >> Because I didn't know how to test for the empty string, but I think
> >> >> that could just be "", right?
> >> >>
> >> >> bye,
> >> >>
> >> >> Erik.
> >> >>
> >> > case "$APXS" in
> >> > "no"|"")
> >> > echo "no"
> >> > ;;
> >> > * )
> >> > echo "default"
> >> > ;;
> >> > esac
> >> >
> >> > The above snippet works fine in my bash. If testing the empty string
> >> > is really a problem, should we not do the same for others too like
> >> > "$SWIG"?

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Jan 18 23:46:53 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.