[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH]Typo fix

From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: 2007-01-17 15:26:07 CET

Nice Info Malcom.

Can I go ahead with the patch without the Copyright year bump?

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran
Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:06:42PM +0530, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>> Malcolm Rowe wrote:
>>> I'm fairly sure that fixing a typo isn't a significant enough change
>>> to create a new derived work (which is why we'd list a range of
>>> copyright years in the first place).
>> I could not understand you. Do you mean not to bump the copyright year
>> for the typo changes if applicable?
> Correct, we shouldn't bump the copyright year for a change this simple.
> The reason we list copyright years at all is so that we can record when
> the work was first published (and therefore when the copyright expires).
> When we make changes to a work, the changes may or may not be protectable
> under copyright themselves: if they are, we have created a derived work
> and gain copyright protection for part of it from the date of the change's
> first publication.
> Obviously, we can't just bump the copyright year without making _any_
> changes to the work, since that would allow us to extend copyright
> infinitely. But we also can't just make a trivial change and bump the
> year, since we could then achieve the same thing by trivial means.
> So when we bump the copyright years, we should only do so if we've added
> something that's worthy of copyright protection. And while that's
> a difficult thing to judge, I'm pretty sure that correcting typos in
> comments isn't.
> ObDisclaimer: IANAL. This is not legal advice.
> Regards,
> Malcolm

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jan 17 15:25:36 2007

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.