Re: Ruby binding test of fs failing on windows

Hi,

On 1/16/07, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/16/07, Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In <ae6cb1100701151651y12503867g60305cb14db929a5@mail.gmail.com>
> > "Ruby binding test of fs failing on windows" on Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:51:47 -0800,
> > "Joe Swatosh" <joe.swatosh@gmail.com> wrote:
> >

> the implementation of Svn::Fs since pools would have to be passed to
> Svn::Ext::Fs, but that the interface of Svn::Fs would remain unchanged
> (except for adding close, and possibly the block versions).
> Essentially, my thought is we could remove the @@fs_pool and let each
> instance have its own @fs_pool. Then couldn't we also remove the
> global that is initialized with the @@fs_pool. (It doesn't *sound*
> that hard, but the SWIG stuff is daunting).
>

I started looking at some of this in more detail. Wow. I'm not at
all sure how this could be accomplished.

--
Joe Swatosh
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org