Re: Teaching svnadmin to remove orphaned locks (Was: [CONTRIB] remove-zombie-locks.py, workaround for Issue #2507)

From: Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev_at_farside.org.uk>
Date: 2007-01-12 19:32:00 CET

On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:30:30AM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> If we have a reason to do so later, we could also add --only-orphaned
> and --wait to 'svnadmin lslocks'.
>

Why would lslocks ever have to wait for a repository lock?

Regards,
Malcolm

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Fri Jan 12 19:32:52 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Daniel Rall: "Re: Perl swig bindings starting to smell"
Previous message: Duncan Murdoch: "Re: Delete revision of an object has no peg revision?"
In reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "Teaching svnadmin to remove orphaned locks (Was: [CONTRIB] remove-zombie-locks.py, workaround for Issue #2507)"
Next in thread: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Teaching svnadmin to remove orphaned locks (Was: [CONTRIB] remove-zombie-locks.py, workaround for Issue #2507)"
Reply: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: Teaching svnadmin to remove orphaned locks (Was: [CONTRIB] remove-zombie-locks.py, workaround for Issue #2507)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]