C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> * If you can stand to bump the version requirement to 1.3, you can
> optionally drop all the pool stuff from the script (and let
> Python manage the memory usage itself).
I intentionally left it at 1.2 for wider compatibility. I personally
use 1.3+ on all my servers though and don't mind if it get's changed.
> There is a matter that *does* require your attention, though. What were
> you envisioning as the license on this contribution? Obviously, we'd
> prefer you use the same license that Subversion does, and failing that
> most of us would probably advise away from the GPL and toward something
> that's Apache/BSD-ish, but the call is yours to make.
I used the GPL because
a) I generally prefer it
b) I considered the interaction between hook-script-caller and
hook-script to be separate enough that the license difference would not
be a problem.
c) I didn't think this script should have long-term use or need to be
migrated out of contrib/ into svn proper (i.e. as you mentioned svnadmin
should eventually know how to clean a repository, and the code should
eventually be fixed to remove need for a hook-script.)
Do you expect it to be a problem? (Or turned around, in what ways would
it be helpful if it was BSD-ish?)
Cheers,
-Nathan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jan 9 22:06:28 2007