Re: ra_serf now passes all tests was Re: svn commit: r22796 - trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline

David Glasser wrote:
> On 12/26/06, John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net> wrote:
>> Point taken. My only concern about making it the default is that it's
>> relatively untested
>> as compared to ra_dav. Unfortunately, I also don't see a way to make
>> it easy for users
>> to try ra_serf without creating multiple binaries. So I guess I'm on
>> the fence as to whether
>> we make it the default.
>
> How tough would it be to be able to build svn with both ra plugins,
> and have the choice of which to use be determined by a
> ~/.subversion/config option (which could be tweaked on a
> server-by-server basis (eg for Google) in ~/.subversion/servers)?
>
> Do the plugins actually overlap in symbols in some way?
>
> --dave
>

I do the same thing when performance comparisons between neon and serf. It's not something designed to be committed, but it works for what I need.

The selection is made based on setting "prefer-ra-library" in ~/.subversion/servers

[global]
prefer-ra-library = dav

or

[global]
prefer-ra-library = serf

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org