On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:24:18PM +0530, Madan U S wrote:
> > Do you mean use name "baton" or use baton syntax with "void *"?
> void, because, introducing svn_wc_entry_private_t still leaves space for ABI revving, when we have svn_wc_entry_private2_t.
> the word 'baton' because this would mean wc specific baton containing wc specific information... and the term is pretty well-known in svn-dev-land.
Batons are usually provided by the caller, not the library. They're
handed back to a callback, hence the name. An existing example of
private data would be within the FS layer, within an svn_fs_t, where we
just call it 'fsap_data'.
From the caller's point of view, I don't believe there's any difference
between a 'void *' and a pointer-to-opaque type, since all pointers are
the same size (and you'll never be able to dereference either); we'd
therefore never need to create a svn_wc_entry_private2_t.
That said, we don't need the type publically named for any other reason,
so just creating a 'void *private; /* private data for libsvn_wc */'
field would make sense to me.
Received on Thu Dec 28 10:41:16 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored