Malcolm R. wrote:
> Sounds fine to me, but I'd like to see some of the outstanding
> entries in STATUS merged first, particularly the one allowing us to
> configure against the current shipping version of Neon without
I'd like to see a 1.4.3 rolled soon.
The r22253 group, r22466, r22501, and possibly r22609 would be good
additions. The r22346 group walks the line between bug fix and
feature, but I personally wouldn't be against including it.
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > I don't know if this has already been discussed on IRC, but I propose to start
> > releasing 1.4.3.
> It would be nice to get a fix to the "JavaHL creates spurious $HOME/auth
> directory" regression since 1.3.x done.
> Anyone looking at that?
I started looking into that, but am still getting setup to reproduce
the problem. If anyone's futher along, I'm happy to step aside and
review a patch instead.
Received on Tue Dec 19 22:49:56 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored