On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Madan S. wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 02:27:03 +0530, Daniel Rall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >Madan, I'm working on rev'ing the API in a fashion which will allow
> >for either of these options (since it turned out to be an enormous
> >amount of work). If you want to tweak your WC without concerns to
> >backwards compatibility to complete the WC -> repos copy/move Merge
> >Tracking work, that would be awesome. I'll fill in on trunk.
> That would be great... that would also help me move on to the two other
> copy/move commands... Thank you, Dan.
Madan, I've rev'd the API -- svn_client_commit_item3_t is now
available to the Subversion libraries, the command-line client, and
all the bindings, on both trunk and the merge-tracking branch. I have
not yet changed its definition, as we were still discussing how it
I was leaning towards option B (a new field, name repos_prop_changes
or something), but you seemed to favor option A (change the name of
the existing field). Let's complete that discussion (from previous
messages on this thread).
Received on Thu Dec 14 00:33:56 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored