Relative URLs in externals definitions. Yes, again.
From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-11-29 22:27:42 CET
Some time ago (Jan 24, 2005), Max kicked off a thread recommending a
In summary, Max proposed the following:
Existing absolute external:
Relative form 1: Scheme-relative (RFC 2396 compliant)
Relative form 2: Host-relative (RFC 2396 compliant)
Relative form 3: Repository-relative (Fill void in RFC 2396)
Relative form 4: Directory-relative (RFC 2396 compliant)
Discussion ensued, with Max defending his proposal.
Then came Greg "Party Pooper" Hudson (Hey, he said it himself!) who
Another idea that can be picked out of the thread is that whatever
It's, uh, sorta frightening that as long as issue #1336 has been around
So the question is, can we get past this UI debate and get this
-- C. Michael Pilato <firstname.lastname@example.org> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.