[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Make configure report the components detected

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-11-17 00:33:04 CET

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> On 11/16/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> >On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, David Glasser wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/16/06, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On 11/16/06, Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh@collab.net> wrote:
> >> >> What happened to this patch?
> >> >
> >> >Nothing: it's still sitting in my working copy. But, I think I should
> >> >apply it, given Peter's reaction.
> >>
> >> Yes, please do -- I haven't tested the patch itself, but I keep
> >> wishing I had that data there (when testing releases, etc).
> >
> >I recall us all being in favor of the concept, but there were a few
> >comments about the implementation, no?
>
> There was only the question about using double quotes to check for
> empty strings. I think that was only out of interest, not out of
> concern.

Looking through my mail, I also mentioned:

"If we're going to report on Java (which I'm in favor of), we should
report on Python (via get-py-info.py?) and Ruby and Perl as well."

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Fri Nov 17 00:34:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.