[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.4.2 win32 binaries?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2006-11-14 01:13:08 CET

On 11/13/06, James Courtier-Dutton <James@superbug.co.uk> wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
> > Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> >> On 11/13/06, David James <james@cs.toronto.edu> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1. These binaries (built by D.J. Heap) are official and we should
> >>> treat them as such.
> >> I think you misunderstand me. :-) I'm saying that it's a *bad* thing
> >> that we've started endorsing and supporting "official binaries". This
> >> represents a big policy change, breaking with 5 years of tradition.
> On a slightly different note. How is the windows binary svn built?
> Is there a gcc for windows that does not require cygwin lib or some
> other runtime libs. The current svn binary does not require any special
> runtime libs.

We had a whole discussion about this at the summit, remember? Trying
to decide which win32 compliers to support? :-)

i think most of us use VC6. That's what our INSTALL instructions assume.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 14 01:13:24 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.