Re: RFC: Changing conditions for 'M'odified status

On 11/9/06, Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com> wrote:
> But there's one catch: if a file has been modified by changing a
> keyword expansion or CRLF->LF (or vice versa), the context *has*
> changed since it was written, but when detranslated+compared it's
> still equal to the text base.

I'm not sure yet how I feel about the actual proposal, but one
clarification: this would only affect "svn status" and not, say, "svn
diff", so the user would discover that this is a false positive (and
perhaps be confused) by typing "svn diff"?

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser_at_mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org