Re: r20666 for 1.4.1 (svn_ra_replay for Perl Bindings)
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Blair Zajac wrote:
> David Anderson wrote:
> >fwiw, I'm happy to hold 1.4.1 to fix this issue in the perl bindings.
> >Svk is an important consumer of our APIs, and as such it should be
> >able to use the new facilities we provide them now, rather than in a
> >month or two when we feel like releasing 1.4.2.
> Why don't we also get r22140 into the next release? It would only
> need one other +1 on it.
Yeah, that would be a good bug fix to have. I just reviewed the
change and +1'd it, but it needs one more +1 to make it in.
Received on Tue Oct 31 20:28:39 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev