Re: Higher level languages as part of the core of SVN
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 11:16:34PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 10/28/06, Malcolm Rowe <email@example.com> wrote:
> >I meant binary compatibility. My understanding from speaking to Dan
> >earlier was that g++/win32 follows the vendor-defined ABI (that is,
> >MSVC on Win32) for C++, so we should be okay as long as we don't expose
> >anything to do with an STL implementation.
> Messages on the GCC list earlier this year from Mark Mitchell hints
> that there is no ABI compatibility between MSVC and g++ and won't be
> any time soon:
Interesting. That's in direct opposition to what I thought Dan was
saying when we discussed this at the summit. Dan: did I misunderstand?
Received on Mon Oct 30 11:44:32 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev