Re: [merge tracking] Implied merge info, and subsequent discussion with Michael Haggerty

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2006-10-26 02:51:28 CEST

Daniel Berlin wrote:
[...]

> It all depends on what level of functionality you want at a first
> pass. I've *always* said i expect to do something different at a
> later point in time. I see this point in time as 2.0, not 1.5.

What he said. I couldn't agree more.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 26 02:51:55 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David James: "Re: [merge tracking] Proposal to track "novel changes""
Previous message: John Szakmeister: "Creating a self-compressed svndiff from a file..."
In reply to: Daniel Berlin: "Re: [merge tracking] Implied merge info, and subsequent discussion with Michael Haggerty"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]