[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Was: Enhancement needed in svn status -u

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-10-25 23:08:34 CEST

On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Paul Burba wrote:
....
> > > > Some of the Python status tests do check for "*", but don't test the
> > > > individual pieces of "out of date" information retrieved from
> > > > repository.
> > >
> > > You're making this statement for the benefit of others reading this
> yes?
> > > Or is there a question for me in here? :-)
> >
> > Yup.
>
> 'Yup' to which question? "Would you like coffee or tea?", "YES!" :-)

Sorry, thought I'd trimmed off more of your post -- the comment was
only for posterity.

...
> > > B) Possible side effects of passing wrong revision to
> > > svn_delta_editor_t delete_entry() implementations.
> >
> > Any findings here?
>
> Short answer is no. I gave the long answer earlier in this thread:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-10/0344.shtml
>
> If my answer there isn't satisfactory let me know.

I'll respond there if I've anything to add.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Wed Oct 25 23:10:05 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.