Re: named changesets

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:40:12AM +0200, Ph. Marek wrote:
> Hello Ed,
>
>
> what you want are (maybe) branches.
>
> Just create a branch with your specified name, switch to that branch, commit,
> switch back if needed.
> If the feature is completed, do a "svn merge" of that branch.
>
> Does that help?

Yeah, it helps a bit, I guess - your idea is that we would have implement one feature
per branch, and then branch off of the branch in order to implement another feature..

Am I understanding this right? The main problem with this is that we would be
branching *all the time*, and that we would have to branch in place because our
directory structure is tied to our environments, and those are expensive to build.

I'd rather say that this particular branch contains independent features
'a', 'b', and 'c', and that 'a' and 'b' are ready and can be merged, but to
hold off on 'c'.

Maybe though, its just my state of mind here...

Ed

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Oct 12 21:27:24 2006