[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn best practices document--possibly out of date?

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-09-25 21:09:58 CEST

On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Erik Huelsmann wrote:

> ... there is a problem with the current rename support: it's
> implemented as Copy+Delete, meaning that the implementation won't be
> able to tell the difference between a genuine copy and a rename.

Refinement of that behavior is underway here:


  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Sep 25 21:11:41 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.