[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn co problems

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-09-14 22:25:52 CEST

On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, D.J. Heap wrote:

> On 9/14/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> >The INSTALL and neon.m4 for 1.4.0 does not support Neon 0.26.x.
> >Recently (r21490), a change did go into neon.m4 and
> >subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/session.c to support 0.26.x for the autoconf
> >build. Given the change to session.c, I'm somewhat surprised that
> >Subversion 1.4.0 compiled against 0.26.x.
>
> It compiles with a warning for an unused callback parameter and the
> change just fixed that warning -- there was no functionality change at
> all that I can see?

A data type for a parameter on the callback is different, no?

--- subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/session.c (revision 21489)
+++ subversion/libsvn_ra_dav/session.c (revision 21490)
@@ -1448,7 +1448,11 @@
 static void
 lock_receiver(void *userdata,
               const struct ne_lock *lock,
+#ifdef SVN_NEON_0_26
+ const ne_uri *uri,
+#else
               const char *uri,
+#endif
               const ne_status *status)
 {
   struct receiver_baton *rb = userdata;

Anyhow, is putting out a quick 1.4.1 necessary?

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Thu Sep 14 22:27:07 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.