Re: [merge-tracking]Why we need PATH_TXN_MERGEINFO in merge-tracking?

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:59:51AM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> We have been through this before. Different processes are allowed to
> reopen the transaction, and have no shared state between them. Thus,
> it must be stored on disk.

To be fair, I think Kamesh suggested at one stage that we persist the
state to disk at transaction-close time, though he didn't explain how
we'd ensure cache coherency, should the same transaction be opened
simultaneously by more than one process.

Regards,
Malcolm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 13 14:56:24 2006