Re: [merge-tracking] points of improvement in mergetracking sqlite db design
From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-09-12 19:20:40 CEST
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:22:21AM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
Exactly. We continue to adhere to DannyB's properties-based design,
Ideally, the merge history index should be the sole store of the merge
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.