[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [merge-tracking] points of improvement in mergetracking sqlite db design

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-09-12 19:20:40 CEST

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Malcolm Rowe wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 08:22:21AM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> > From the conversations I've had with Dan about it, I believe it's only
> > the back end storage that will change, it will still show up as
> > properties to the client.
> >
> Ah, excellent. Thanks, Garrett.

Exactly. We continue to adhere to DannyB's properties-based design,
while eliminating any redundant storage on the backend in the
Subversion FS.

Ideally, the merge history index should be the sole store of the merge
info, exposed through the libsvn_fs APIs as properties.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Tue Sep 12 20:14:04 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.