-----rooneg@gmail.com wrote: -----
>To: "SVN Dev" <dev@subversion.tigris.org>
>From: "Garrett Rooney" <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net>
>Sent by: rooneg@gmail.com
>Date: 09/11/2006 06:18PM
>Subject: Neon 0.24.x Support
>
>So, today seems to be the day of Neon 0.24.x problems. I started
>today trying to track down problems that I introduced last week that
>only show up with 0.24.x, and I finished it helping to fix build
>problems with the redirect stuff that only show up with 0.24.x.
>Unfortunately, there's still a problem with the redirect change that
>keeps things from working at all in 0.24.x land, and all this stuff
>is
>really making me wonder.
>
>At what point do we generally stop supporting a Neon release?
>0.24.7,
>the last version from the 0.24.x line that we support, came out on
>July 5th 2004. Neon 0.25 was released in April 2005. There's
>already a 0.26 out there. Should we just call it a day and start
>pulling the 0.24 stuff out? It would certainly simplify life in
>ra_dav land.
>
>I mean how many people are actually still developing with 0.24? Now
>that Paul updated his win32 build to 0.25 I'd be surprised if there
>was anyone who was using it unless they were actively testing 0.24
>compatibility stuff.
>Did anyone even test it for the 1.4.0 release?
FWIW my VM for all the 1.4.0 RCs I tested/signed used Neon 0.25.5 (right
out of the dependency zip file). I was only using 0.24.7 for trunk
development, it's simply what I've been using since I set up my work
machine back in the day and it worked until r21332 - No compelling reason
for it beyond inertia.
>Personally, I think its time has come and gone, and it's time to
>give
>it the boot.
+1
Paul B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 12 01:23:54 2006