[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [merge-tracking] points of improvement in mergetracking sqlite db design

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-09-11 22:00:17 CEST

On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> >> Yes, so?
> >> when you delete it, you will get a property delete, and we will mark
> >> the megreinfo as having changed in that revision, with a now empty
> >> mergeinfo.
> >>
> >
> >I remember you were saying eventually we will move out of
> >'svn:mergeinfo' prop for merge history tracking.
> I said some people would like to do that. I have no personal plans to
> implement it :)

For the record, "some people" includes me. I've had too many bad
experiences with needing to keep redundant data in sync between
multiple data stores to want to add such a thing into a new system.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Sep 11 22:06:06 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.