Re: svn commit: r21289 - in trunk: build/ac-macros subversion/libsvn_ra_dav
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Malcolm Rowe wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 01:04:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > Speaking of which, isn't a list rather the wrong approach to take here?
> > Shouldn't we accept:
> > * any 0.24.x where x >= 7
> > * any 0.25.x
> > * any 0.26.x
> > ?
> Yes, in theory. I think that, historically, Neon hasn't been exactly
> stable over the sub-minor versions, and so the current 'approve known-good
> versions' approach evolved from that. I don't know whether that approach
> is still necessary.
That's why we have the explicit "allow list" in the first place.
Given the number of problems seen with Neon Windows auth, I tend to
think we should stick with this approach.
Received on Sat Sep 2 00:33:29 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev