Max Bowsher wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> My issue is that you feel the conversation was ended and I don't think
>> that had happened yet. We knew that Brane wasn't happy with it, he
>> never had an opportunity to reply to your 'logically countered' reply,
>> and we just went ahead and merged it in r21223.
>>
>
> I don't feel that the conversation has ended, and Brane still has an
> opportunity reply.
>
I didn't reply to an "I'm right because I'm right" argument about such a
triviality because the only thing I could come up with looked
suspiciously like a flame, and I didn't want to pour kerosene on a
thread that's already lasted about 10x longer than would be even
remotely useful.
> I went ahead and merged it because I think it's better that we have an
> rc5 that we _might_ accept, than no rc at all whilst this conversation
> continues.
>
You went ahead and merged something that other people had voiced serious
objections about. That was formally correct, as there were no -1's in
STATUS -- this not being a technical issue, I thought responding on list
would be more appropriate than vetoing the merge. IMNSHO you did bloody
well abuse your privilege and my trust. Please don't do it again.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Aug 26 01:16:59 2006