[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: defining 'core' subversion (was Re: maintaining a list of svn: revprops)

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2006-08-21 05:19:01 CEST

On 8/19/06, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> Ooh. Now that's an interesting criteria. I have to admit, the fact
> that all the C-language svn* binaries get installed makes them feel
> much more 'official' than anything in tools/.

FWIW, I think svnsync is going to become a critical tool for a
significant amount of people. Hence, it should be treated as part of
the svn 'core' - regardless of how we define 'core'.

As to how we define the 'core', I agree that anything we choose to
install with 'make install' should be assumed to be a part of the
'core' until proven otherwise. =) -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 21 05:19:32 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.