[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: defining 'core' subversion (was Re: maintaining a list of svn: revprops)

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2006-08-19 18:27:05 CEST

On 8/19/06, Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman@red-bean.com> wrote:
> On 8/19/06, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org> wrote:
> > > Stuff in tools/ *is* in the main source tree, and is a supported part
> > > of Subversion.
> >
> > make install still doesn't install them, right? That makes
> > tools/ a ghetto. I feel the same way about the bindings.
> Ooh. Now that's an interesting criteria. I have to admit, the fact
> that all the C-language svn* binaries get installed makes them feel
> much more 'official' than anything in tools/.

+1, if it gets installed via 'make install' it seems more "real" to me.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Aug 19 18:27:47 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.