Re: atomic revprop commits at the RA level

On 8/10/06, David Glasser <glasser@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 8/10/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> > I'd say that the default implementation should return an error, for
> > just this reason.
>
> How do "default implementations" of editor calls work?

I explained this ot David on IRC, but for the record, we have a
function that returns a "default" version of the editor, with no-op
functions in place for each operation. I was suggesting that the
default implementation of this function would return an error, and
you'd replace it with one that does something for editors that can
actually do this.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 11 01:26:57 2006