Re: svn commit: r21016 - in trunk: . subversion/include/private subversion/libsvn_fs_base/bdb subversion/libsvn_subr

On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:33 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>
> Will this always be used in places where no parameters need to be
> passed? How about:
>
> svn_error_t *
> svn_atomic_init_once(volatile svn_atomic_t *global_status,
> svn_error_t *(*init_func)(void *baton),
> void *baton);

Huh. Can you think of a case where it makes sense to pass parameters
to an atomic initialization function? My intuition is that if you
want to do that, your designed is subtly wrong.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 9 23:57:17 2006