Re: svn commit: r20781 - trunk

On 7/25/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> I like the sound of David's suggested approach better. I found it
> weird that autogen was to be removing the Python bytecode on the
> grounds that we shouldn't be packaging them with the source tarball,
> since it doesn't really strike me as autogen's job. Doing this in
> dist.sh, on the other hand, is very appropriate, and satisfies Max's
> desired behavior. I'd +1 a backport of that, but am -0 on the change
> to autogen.

Ditto.

I'm also concerned that there is a spurious -print in autogen.sh right
now that causes a bunch of junk to be printed - there's no need to
emit any info even if we were to delete the pyc's from autogen.sh. --
justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 2 05:58:23 2006