[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r20893 - branches/merge-tracking/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs

From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-07-31 11:18:48 CEST

Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>> Daniel Rall wrote:
>>> Okay -- we need to always do the cleanup, 'cuz if we don't we could
>>> leave stray records around the merge info index. Which don't actively
>>> harm anything, but perhaps should be deleted...
>>> The API probably shouldn't be named index_merge_info(), then.
>>> update_merge_info() would be better, but is already taken. Should we
>>> merge the two routines into a single routine, or rename the existing
>>> update_merge_info() function to something more specific?
>> Find the attached patch.
> I've committed a variation of this in r20923 which uses slightly less
> SQL-y function names.
> I take it you didn't like the idea of merging the merge info index
> entry point function you added and the function which loops over any
> merge info for a transaction?
I overlooked at it, will see it through.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 31 23:50:54 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.