On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> Madan U Sreenivasan wrote:
> >On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 03:18:39 +0530, Daniel Rall <email@example.com> wrote:
> >>Okay -- we need to always do the cleanup, 'cuz if we don't we could
> >>leave stray records around the merge info index. Which don't actively
> >>harm anything, but perhaps should be deleted...
> >>The API probably shouldn't be named index_merge_info(), then.
> >>update_merge_info() would be better, but is already taken.
> >Where? I can only see update_wc_merge_info().
> Dlr, would have meant 'update_mergeinfo_index' in
Yeah, I meant that one, sorry.
Received on Mon Jul 31 21:17:10 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored