Re: [PATCH] Fix API doc parameter reference

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Malcolm Rowe wrote:

> > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Julian Foad wrote:
> > > Rename some API parameters for consistency. This does not constitute an API
> > > or ABI change, as the parameters are only within a pointer-to-function type.
> > >
>
> (Does renaming arguments ever constitute an API/ABI change?)
>
> On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 11:07:21PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > I'm guessing that our SWIG stuff doesn't expose this API, but if it
> > does, it could have some impact there.
>
> Why's that? Does SWIG depend upon the names of arguments used in
> function declarations?

Yeah, it does depend on parameter names.

Alongside Julian's patch, should we also ditch the "copy_path"
parameter from svn_delta.i? add_file() is the only place I see it
used in svn_delta.h.

Index: subversion/bindings/swig/svn_delta.i
===================================================================
--- subversion/bindings/swig/svn_delta.i (revision 20914)
+++ subversion/bindings/swig/svn_delta.i (working copy)
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@
 %apply const char *MAY_BE_NULL {
     const char *error_info,
     const char *copyfrom_path,
- const char *copy_path,
     const char *base_checksum,
     const char *text_checksum
 };