On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:41:09 +0530, Daniel Rall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Madan S. wrote:
>> Introduce the translate_paths parameter, to conditionally append
>> the basename of the target to the mergefrom source paths.
> Would you describe the use case for this behavior? I'd like to
> understand why it's needed (I assume in libsvn_client/diff.c).
Okay currently, if svn_ra_get_merge_info() is invoked on
If /branches/branch1/cc has mergeinfo
returned_merge_info = mergeinfo_of_/branches/branch1/cc
returned_merge_info = mergeinfo_of_/branches/branch1 (or the earliest
parent in the hierarchy which has mergeinfo)
Now, in addition to that, all the mergefrom paths ( the /trunk in
'/trunk:1-10' mergeinfo format), are appended with the basename of the
target path - in this case cc.
So, the mergeinfo I would get on invokation of svn_ra_get_merge_info() for
/branches/branch1/cc would look something like:
(*) I opine that we only need to store
/trunk:1-5 as the mergeinfo in /trunk/branches/branch1/cc.
Now, that said, the term translate_paths might be a misnomer. I could be
more like append_base_path or something like that.
> I don't grasp every last detail here, but the behavior doesn't seem
> valid to me. How can the client do path translation when it doesn't
> have access to the repository FS? I discussed the following two cases
> for translate_paths=false on IRC with DannyB:
> 1) When include_parents=false, we don't include inherited merge
> history for the parents of the requested paths. Because of this, only
> the requested paths themselves will ever be returned by the API,
Did you mean 'Only *the mergeinfo of* the requested paths will ever be
> meaning that the translate_paths parameter becomes irrelevant (other
> than the fact that translate_paths=true isn't even a valid value
Agree. But as I said earlier, as long as svn_ra_get_merge_info() appends
the basename of the targetpath to the mergefrom sources, this portion of
the client cannot use it. The reason being (*) I mentioned above.
> 2) Otherwise, when include_parents=true, you must make assumptions on
> the client-side about how your non-translated path relates to your WC.
> While most of the time these assumptions will turn out to be correct,
> aren't there edge cases which could bite us when we don't have access
> to the repos FS?
> For instance, if you request merge info for /branches/foo/bar, and the
> merge info for that path comes back "/trunk:1-5", but the path
> /trunk/bar does not represent the same object as /branches/foo/bar
> (e.g. if /trunk/bar was renamed to /trunk/baz, and a new /trunk/bar
> has been created), appending "bar" to "/trunk" on the client side
> isn't correct -- we need the merge info's source to be translated to
> "/trunk/baz:1-5" (or whatever). I don't see how the client can do
> this efficiently.
Am sorry. I do not understand the need for such a translation of paths.
Could you pl. explain?
Looking at your example, I have two points to make:
1) IMHO, The mergeinfo '/trunk/bar:1-5' should never change to
'/trunk/baz:1-5', on any given target path. The reason is: between r1-5,
the mergedfrom path *was* /trunk/bar and not /trunk/baz.
2) The so-called path translation mechanism (available in
get_merge_info_for_path()) currently only appends the basename to the
mergefrom source paths. It does not have the intelligent mechanism that
To unsubscribe, e-mail: email@example.com
For additional commands, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Received on Thu Jul 20 09:39:35 2006