[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r20576 - branches/merge-tracking

From: Daniel Rall <dlr_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-07-12 19:02:07 CEST

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Madan S. wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:17:46 +0530, <dlr@tigris.org> wrote:
>
> >Author: dlr
> >Date: Tue Jul 11 14:47:46 2006
> >New Revision: 20576
>
> [snip]
>
> >+Phase 2
> >+=======
>
> [snip]
>
> >+ --record-only do not perform an actual merge of the changes, yet
> >record
>
> Why do we have --record-only in phase 2? I think it deserves to be in
> phase 1 (completion of functionality - recording mergeinfo - wise). Any
> special reasons?

No, there's no particular reason for that -- none of what's in TODO is
set in stone. Adding the equivalent of a --record-only as part of
phase 1 seems perfectly reasonable to me.

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Wed Jul 12 19:03:25 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.