On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 15:28 -0400, Toby Johnson wrote:
> I was surprised to find that no one has worked on C# bindings for
> Subversion, now that SWIG supports that language. I started to look into
> what the effort would be to work on this, assuming I could start with
> the Perl and Ruby bindings as examples, but unfortunately my knowledge
> of C is limited and my knowledge of Makefiles even more so.
> So I guess my first question is whether I'm in over my head... maybe my
> understanding of SWIG is flawed but I figured once bindings were there
> for one language, others would be more or less trivial, but looking at
> the libsvn_swig_xx "utility" functions this doesn't seem to be the case.
> It seems that not only is a lot of non-trivial C required, but a rather
> deep understanding of the Subversion internals.
> Is my assessment of the effort involved here correct, and if so, is
> there anyone else with more knowledge of Subversion who has attempted to
> generate the C# bindings? I'd be willing to help out with the C# coding
> and some of the simpler C stuff if there is any other interest in this
> from someone who understands the Subversion internals.
From previous experience with C#, I'd say writing bindings without SWIG
might actually be easier. C#'s P/Invoke is very powerful.
See the attached C# file for a quick 'n' dirty, but working, example.
Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer_at_samba.org> - http://samba.org/~jelmer/
Received on Tue Jul 11 22:03:54 2006